Magnetoplankton
The artificial plankton, called the "magnetoplankton" - a term derived from the
Latin (magnes, -etis, magnet), and plankton (from the Greek πλαγκτός, planktos,
wandering) – is a lab specimen that lives in glass tanks with water samples and live
plankton, magnetic micro-robots that dynamically respond to variable oscillations in
electromagnetic fields processed in real-time by feedback algorithms.
Experiments on artificial life structures that seek a symbiotic relationship with their
environment through processes related to fields studied by magneto-chemistry, the
hypothesis of this artistic experiment raises the idea that life, by being structured
in the environment of the water molecule, perceives subtle energy oscillations: the
diamagnetism of water that affects its surface tension, causing oscillations that
generate links with other elements of energy systems.
Thales of Miletus, considered by history to be the first philosopher for his rational
study of natural phenomena, believed water to be the source of life, from which
everything precedes and to which everything returns. He was the first to study
electricity and magnetism, a force he believed to be similar to the soul and which was
present in all particles, each of which was a god. For Aristotle, Thales de Miletus was
the first to suggest that all matter was constituted by a single substrate. In addition
to his attempt to explain nature by simplifying observable phenomena and searching
for causes within the natural environment itself, and as a result of these reductionist
elements, Thales used an empirical approach to unravel the mysteries of physical life
that are most awe-inspiring and are therefore interconnected: the electromagnetic
field and the water molecule.
Recent studies in magnetochemistry have considered water's powerful molecular
bond to be the basis for its complex properties: it is the covalent bond which occurs
in electron spin pairs that generates the picosecond links in molecular bonds, in
clusters of five molecules, with each water molecule linked to four other water
molecules.
Proposal
Metallic micro-robots are exposed to an electromagnetic pulse to induce a residual magnetic field through hysteresis; these robots endowed with a magnetic memory
will inhabit a glass tank that will be placed on an induction coil wound with enamelled
copper wire. A micro-controller will generate variable voltage pulses that will be
amplified and emitted to the coil, producing electromagnetic fields at variable
frequencies. The micro-robots will then react to these fields by exhibiting kinetic
properties.
The physical reaction to these movements will produce micro-sounds in the glass
structure which will be amplified by piezoelectric and neodymium speakers. The
variables that produce the oscillations will be obtained through specific sensors
reacting to the conditions of biological processes, which will feed the different
systems with data, establishing communication between the various tanks. These
tanks, managed by scientific protocols, will sustain living plankton colonies.
The public, using portable digital microscopes, will observe the microscopic plankton
life and the magnetoplankton on a small LCD screen. By moving the microscope
lenses closer to the tank the public will influence the micro-robots via the neodymium
magnets surrounding the lenses. The micro-robots will exhibit unexpected reactions
when affected by these new magnetic fields in their surroundings. Five tanks will be
built to be placed on a pentagonal table.
Project: de Arcangel Constantini
comision by
Emergencies 2012 Cultivamos Cultura Portugal <
http://emergencias2012.net/en
Curator, Marta de Meneses , Produccion Catarina Cerdeira
residency @! EngageLab Computer Graphics Centre University of Minho)
support Arte+Ciencia UNAM Mexico
Dra. Maria Antonia Gonzalez Valerio ( teoría ), Dra. María Ana Fernández Álamo ( biología )
Models,CNC > Santiago Itzcoatl . taller: La Metropolitana
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnetoplankton. Vidas minúsculas en movimiento
Maria Antonia Gonzalez Valerio.
1. Artificial life or robots in motion.
Is it by chance that movement has always been considered one of the essential
characteristics of living beings? Considered in this way, attempts have been made not
only to affirm that autonomous movement is a key characteristic of living beings but also to
investigate how movement is produced, what its cause might be, how it affects living beings,
and what kinds of movements there are or might be. In this context, to animate the inanimate
means to give it movement, preferably autonomous movement, and to make it react to
exterior stimuli.
It is a question of building miniscule robots that imitate the tiny size of the organisms which
gather and live as plankton, making vertical movements, and which define life in water, both
fresh and salt.
We need to create movement, to define its cause – or not – and, most importantly, to avoid
directionality. It has to be a special kind of movement that corresponds to the project of
creating bioartificiality in the area where art, science, and technology intersect.
In this case, bioartificiality is produced, not with living organisms, but by creating and
recreating some of life's functions, which involves subverting life, not through its materiality,
but through its functionality. This subversion does not play at duplication – it is not a question
of creating an "as if", as if the robots were alive – but of creating new ways of being alive,
of opening the space-time in which the living might occur in a different way. Occurring as a
machine moving in water, in a game of mechanisms without purpose or effort. Living in water
as a moving robot, as an artefactual or bioartefactual entity, because it must be remembered
that life or living lies not just in materiality – it is not only the material cause which will govern
the living – but also in its formal cause, the final cause which produces movement. Here,
there are no living organisms in materiality, but it is only in that sense that there are none.
However, where does movement come from? What kind of movement are we dealing with
here? It is interesting to observe a kind of movement which can be understood rhizomatically;
that is, instead of having a linear, fixed, monotonous directionality responding to its own
impulse, this movement is dispersed in time and space thanks to its relationship with the
other. In this context, the other is represented by water and magnetic energy.
A planktonic artefact traversed by magnetic forces. The movement does not belong to the
robot as an agent, a cause-subject determining what it is and the way it is, but to the point
in which movement occurs and in which the robot moves. Autonomy of movement? Yes,
autonomy of movement and not of the agent acting as the cause, the controller, the governor
of its own movement. And although life is usually defined biologically, with autonomous
movement being included as one of its essential functions, what we present here is the
subversion of life through a multiple movement consisting of movements interacting with each
other, or rather forces interacting with each other, and forces interacting with substances such
as water and metal, which, in turn, are nothing more than what is rhizomatically moved.
"Rhizomatic" movement is not equivalent to "chaotic" movement. By describing it in this
way, what I am trying to highlight, in reference to planktonic robots, is that it generates
relationships, connections, determinations and the result it is that it is impossible to see the
robot as autonomous machine. On the contrary, it is overtaken by movements and forces that
belong equally to it and to the other. In other words, it is impossible to identify or separate the
other and the self. "Make rhizomes, not roots, never plant! Don´t sow, grow offshoots! Don't
be one or multiple, be multiplicities! Run lines, never plot a point! Speed turns the point into a
line. Be quick, even when standing still!" (Deleuze and Guattari, "Rizhome").
What arises from these movements, these relationships, these interactions?
How are planktonic robots realized?
Multiplicities which become sentient not only in the movements, but also in the plankton….
2. Live plankton culture or live ars
To present a world in its two possibilities. To present bio-artificiality in its two modes of being.
To open a connecting space through which artefacts and living organisms are filtered. Robots
on one side, plankton on the other. The former are given life through movement, the latter
are rendered artificial through the image; in any case, they both acquire another mode of
being when subjected to the perverse reciprocity that duplicates one in the other. Seeing
themselves in the other which, however, is not (its other).
The plankton has a diversity that it has not yet been possibly to classify; a synthetic and
extremely condensed sample that allows us to see that it is all there is, that the material
overflows in such a way from its multiplicities that it is more convenient to focus on the
multiple in multiplicity, with no unity, no point of synthesis or concentric reunion from which to
glimpse the unity, the single. Heterogeneity remains and becomes present without harmony.
It is the other of the other and is therefore deprived of anything by which to relate or condense
that multiplicity. There is no point of support, because there is no unity. To see, and to see,
and to see, and to keep seeing a universe that cannot be determined and that it might be
possible to hold in my hands, or rather representatively in the hundreds of flasks piled up in a
lab. Hypotheses thrown at the glass.
Nor does multiplicity allow itself to be reduced to quantification, as if we could only say
that there is "a lot". It is not even a question of saying that everything or almost everything
that exists and will exist as a life form in water or in transit through water is contained in an
embryonic state in the plankton. It is not the origin (arché) of what will arise afterwards. It is
the multiplicity that can only be perceived by a gaze that does not attach itself to anything and
avoids unity from the outset. There is no beginning. |